- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo8 vs Redmi Note 12T Pro
Vivo iQOO Neo8 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
What iQOO Neo8 does better (17) and where Redmi Note 12T Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Display7.0
8.3Camera7.2
7.8Battery8.0
8.7Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo8Redmi Note 12T Pro
| iQOO Neo8 | Redmi Note 12T Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.7 mm | 163.6 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 74.3 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 200 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo8 better than Redmi Note 12T Pro?
- Wired charging120 W vs 67 W+79%
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 12T Pro: No
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 650 nits2×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi Note 12T Pro: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Charged in 30 min167% vs 75%2.2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi Note 12T Pro: No
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Pixel density453 ppi vs 407 ppi+11%
Why is Redmi Note 12T Pro better than iQOO Neo8?
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · iQOO Neo8: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · iQOO Neo8: Yes
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.7 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Colours | Red, Mint, Black | Blue, White, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 650 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.5% | 85.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,207,095 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,222 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,703 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,080 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 167% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, ultrasound proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China) | MIUI 14 |
