android.gs
Compare
iQOO Neo8 Pro vs 14T Pro

Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro vs Xiaomi 14T Pro

What iQOO Neo8 Pro does better (4) and where 14T Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Vivo · 2023iQOO Neo8 Pro

9.2Score

4 advantages≈ $460

Xiaomi · 202414T Pro

9.4Score

12 advantages≈ $430

Higher score

9.4Display9.5

8.6Performance8.8

8.9Camera9.2

7.8Battery7.3

8.7Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO Neo8 Pro14T Pro

	iQOO Neo8 Pro	14T Pro	Difference
Height	164.7 mm	160.4 mm	+4.3 mm
Width	77 mm	75.1 mm	+1.9 mm
Thickness	8.5 mm	8.4 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	192 g	209 g	−17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO Neo8 Pro better than 14T Pro?

Memory card slotYes · 14T Pro: No
Weight192 g vs 209 g+9%
Charged in 30 min167% vs 158%+6%
Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,220 px+3%

Why is 14T Pro better than iQOO Neo8 Pro?

Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 4,000 nits3.1×
Telephoto cameraNo · iQOO Neo8 Pro: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · iQOO Neo8 Pro: Yes
AnTuTu score1,920,379 vs 2,015,655+5%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,643 vs 7,081+25%
Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
4K selfie videoNo · iQOO Neo8 Pro: Yes
eSIMNo · iQOO Neo8 Pro: Yes
3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,675 vs 3,998+9%
Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro≈ $4609.2	Xiaomi 14T Pro≈ $4309.4
Design
Weight	192 g	209 g
Thickness	8.5 mm	8.4 mm
Height	164.7 mm	160.4 mm
Width	77 mm	75.1 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Leather	Glass
Ingress protection	—	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Red, Mint, Black	Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,260 px	1,220 px
Resolution (height)	2,800 px	2,712 px
Pixel density	453 ppi	446 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,300 nits	4,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,222 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	87.5%	89.1%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 9200+	Mediatek Dimensity 9300+
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.35 GHz	3.4 GHz
GPU	Immortalis-G715 MC11	Immortalis-G720 MC12
AnTuTu score	1,920,379	2,015,655
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	5,643	7,081
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,675	3,998
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.49"	1/1.31"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	2.6×
Max video	8K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	12.5 h
Wired charging	120 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	167%	158%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	50 W
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China)	HyperOS