- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo12 vs Redmi K100 Pro Max
Vivo iQOO Neo12 vs Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro Max
What iQOO Neo12 does better (4) and where Redmi K100 Pro Max wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display9.7
8.8Camera9.8
9.6Battery9.8
9.3Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo12Redmi K100 Pro Max
| iQOO Neo12 | Redmi K100 Pro Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.4 mm | 163.5 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 78 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.5 mm | = |
| Weight | 225 g | 238 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo12 better than Redmi K100 Pro Max?
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Pixel density514 ppi vs 416 ppi+24%
- Weight225 g vs 238 g+6%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,200 px+20%
Why is Redmi K100 Pro Max better than iQOO Neo12?
- Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
- Peak brightness2,200 nits vs 4,500 nits2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · iQOO Neo12: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · iQOO Neo12: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · iQOO Neo12: Yes
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 225 g | 238 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 163.4 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 78 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Gray | Black, White, Blue, Red (Burgundy) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,200 px | 2,608 px |
| Pixel density | 514 ppi | 416 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 185 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,200 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 91.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 840 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 3,722,803 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 11,299 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.4" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 5× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 9,000 mAh | 9,070 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 100 W |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 7 | HyperOS 3 |
