- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo10 (China) vs Redmi K80 Ultra
Vivo iQOO Neo10 (China) vs Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra
What iQOO Neo10 (China) does better (5) and where Redmi K80 Ultra wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display9.7
8.8Performance9.3
8.9Camera9.0
9.3Battery9.5
9.2Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo10 (China)Redmi K80 Ultra
| iQOO Neo10 (China) | Redmi K80 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 163.1 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 77.9 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 219 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo10 (China) better than Redmi K80 Ultra?
- Wired charging120 W vs 100 W+20%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,200 nits+41%
- Weight199 g vs 219 g+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.2 mm+2%
Why is Redmi K80 Ultra better than iQOO Neo10 (China)?
- AnTuTu score2,359,464 vs 2,926,668+24%
- Battery capacity6,100 mAh vs 7,410 mAh+21%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,478 vs 9,174+42%
- CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+10%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 219 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Scratch/drop-resistant glass |
| Colours | Black, White, Orange | Gray, White, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 90.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,359,464 | 2,926,668 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,478 | 9,174 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,100 mAh | 7,410 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 5 | HyperOS 2 |
