How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO Neo 7 Pro vs Poco F6

Vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F6

What iQOO Neo 7 Pro does better (3) and where Poco F6 wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro
Vivo · 2023iQOO Neo 7 Pro
8.4Score
3 advantages≈ $410
vs
Xiaomi Poco F6
Xiaomi · 2024Poco F6
8.6Score
12 advantages≈ $410
Higher score
8.1Display8.8
8.1Camera8.8
7.8Battery4.9
6.6Features6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO Neo 7 ProPoco F6
76.9 × 164.88.574.5 × 160.58
iQOO Neo 7 ProPoco F6Difference
Height164.8 mm160.5 mm+4.3 mm
Width76.9 mm74.5 mm+2.4 mm
Thickness8.5 mm8 mm+0.5 mm
Weight197 g179 g+18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO Neo 7 Pro better than Poco F6?

  1. Wired charging120 W vs 90 W+33%
  2. Charged in 30 min188% vs 86%2.2×
  3. CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 3 GHz+6%

Why is Poco F6 better than iQOO Neo 7 Pro?

  1. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  2. NFCNo · iQOO Neo 7 Pro: Yes
  3. Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 2,400 nits+85%
  4. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  5. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  6. Pixel density388 ppi vs 446 ppi+15%
  7. Weight197 g vs 179 g+10%
  8. Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
  10. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,220 px+13%
  11. Thickness8.5 mm vs 8 mm+6%
  12. Screen-to-body ratio87.6% vs 89.8%+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco F6Xiaomi Poco F6≈ $4108.6
Design
Weight197 g179 g
Thickness8.5 mm8 mm
Height164.8 mm160.5 mm
Width76.9 mm74.5 mm
FramePlasticPlastic
BackLeatherPlastic
Ingress protection—IP64
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
ColoursFearless Flame, Dark StormBlack, Green, Titanium
Display
Screen size6.8″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,220 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,712 px
Pixel density388 ppi446 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,300 nits2,400 nits
Measured brightness—1,218 nits
Screen-to-body ratio87.6%89.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.19 GHz3 GHz
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 735
AnTuTu score—1,497,886
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—4,883
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—3,110
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.57"1/1.95"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera16 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—10.6 h
Wired charging120 W90 W
Charged in 30 min188%86%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCNoYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 13HyperOS
Major OS updates promised—3
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare