- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO 9 vs Poco F4 GT
Vivo iQOO 9 vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
What iQOO 9 does better (8) and where Poco F4 GT wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.4
6.7Performance7.3
8.3Camera8.0
6.3Battery6.8
8.1Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO 9Poco F4 GT
| iQOO 9 | Poco F4 GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.1 mm | 162.5 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.7 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.5 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 210 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO 9 better than Poco F4 GT?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Poco F4 GT: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Poco F4 GT: No
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 800 nits+50%
- Weight200 g vs 210 g+5%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Charged in 30 min250% vs 176%+42%
- Loudspeaker loudness-25.5 LUFS vs -27.4 LUFS+-7%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Poco F4 GT better than iQOO 9?
- AnTuTu score745,168 vs 952,124+28%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Battery capacity4,350 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+8%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,503 vs 3,637+4%
- Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 159.1 mm | 162.5 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Legend, Alpha, Phoenix Orange | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 749 nits | 758 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.5% | 86.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.99 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 745,168 | 952,124 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,503 | 3,637 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,471 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,350 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 250% | 176% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | -27.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.59 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 12 | HyperOS 2 |
