- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO 5 Pro 5G vs nubia RedMagic 5S
Vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 5S
What iQOO 5 Pro 5G does better (11) and where nubia RedMagic 5S wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Display8.9
9.5Camera7.7
5.5Battery5.1
7.9Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO 5 Pro 5Gnubia RedMagic 5S
| iQOO 5 Pro 5G | nubia RedMagic 5S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.6 mm | 168.6 mm | −9 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 78 mm | −4.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.8 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 220 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO 5 Pro 5G better than nubia RedMagic 5S?
- Wired charging120 W vs 55 W2.2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia RedMagic 5S: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 5S: No
- Charged in 30 min300% vs 112%2.7×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Weight198 g vs 220 g+11%
- Pixel density398 ppi vs 388 ppi+3%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 9.8 mm+10%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.4% vs 82.5%+8%
Why is nubia RedMagic 5S better than iQOO 5 Pro 5G?
- Stereo speakersNo · iQOO 5 Pro 5G: Yes
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+12%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · iQOO 5 Pro 5G: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 220 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.8 mm |
| Height | 159.6 mm | 168.6 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 78 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | White, Black | Silver, Pulse |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 459 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 82.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 557,056 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 13,400 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.31" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 55 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 300% | 112% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | — | 3 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -22.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
