- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO 15T vs 17 Max
Vivo iQOO 15T vs Xiaomi 17 Max
What iQOO 15T does better (6) and where 17 Max wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO 15T17 Max
| iQOO 15T | 17 Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.4 mm | 162.9 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 77.6 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 216 g | 219 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO 15T better than 17 Max?
- AnTuTu score4,704,310 vs 3,654,776+29%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,500 nits+29%
- Pixel density510 ppi vs 420 ppi+21%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,200 px+20%
Why is 17 Max better than iQOO 15T?
- Telephoto cameraNo · iQOO 15T: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · iQOO 15T: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,634 vs 11,674+10%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · iQOO 15T: Yes
- CPU frequency4.21 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+9%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 216 g | 219 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 163.4 mm | 162.9 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, White | Black, Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,168 px | 2,608 px |
| Pixel density | 510 ppi | 420 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 3,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,055 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.2% | 90.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Monster | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.21 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 | Adreno 840 |
| AnTuTu score | 4,704,310 | 3,654,776 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 10,634 | 11,674 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.4" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 100 W |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 6 | HyperOS 3 |
