How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO 15 Ultra vs nubia RedMagic 11S Pro

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 11S Pro

What iQOO 15 Ultra does better (12) and where nubia RedMagic 11S Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Vivo · 2026iQOO 15 Ultra
9.7Score
12 advantages≈ $790
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 11S Pro
9.6Score
5 advantages≈ $860
9.8Display9.6
9.8Performance9.7
9.4Camera8.9
9.7Battery9.8
9.4Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO 15 Ultranubia RedMagic 11S Pro
76.8 × 163.78.776.5 × 163.88.9
iQOO 15 Ultranubia RedMagic 11S ProDifference
Height163.7 mm163.8 mm−0.1 mm
Width76.8 mm76.5 mm+0.3 mm
Thickness8.7 mm8.9 mm−0.2 mm
Weight227 g230 g−3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO 15 Ultra better than nubia RedMagic 11S Pro?

  1. Peak brightness8,000 nits vs 1,800 nits4.4×
  2. AnTuTu score4,602,290 vs 3,377,500+36%
  3. RAM24 GB vs 16 GB+50%
  4. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  5. Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 11S Pro: No
  6. Wired charging100 W vs 80 W+25%
  7. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
  8. 4K selfie videoYes · nubia RedMagic 11S Pro: No
  9. Pixel density508 ppi vs 431 ppi+18%
  10. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  11. Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,216 px+18%
  12. Thickness8.7 mm vs 8.9 mm+2%

Why is nubia RedMagic 11S Pro better than iQOO 15 Ultra?

  1. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)11,366 vs 11,708+3%
  2. Wireless charging power40 W vs 80 W2×
  3. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · iQOO 15 Ultra: Yes
  4. Measured brightness1,534 nits vs 1,587 nits+3%
  5. CPU frequency4.6 GHz vs 4.74 GHz+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight227 g230 g
Thickness8.7 mm8.9 mm
Height163.7 mm163.8 mm
Width76.8 mm76.5 mm
Frame—Aluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass
ColoursBlack, SilverNightfreeze (Black Transparent), Subzero (Silver Transparent)
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)3,168 px2,688 px
Pixel density508 ppi431 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness8,000 nits1,800 nits
Measured brightness1,534 nits1,587 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.7%90.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.6 GHz4.74 GHz
GPUAdreno 840Adreno 840
AnTuTu score4,602,2903,377,500
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)11,36611,708
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—8,160
Memory
RAM24 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.55"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity7,400 mAh7,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—20.3 h
Wired charging100 W80 W
Charged in 30 min62%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power40 W80 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version3.23.2
Video outputYesYes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 6Redmagic OS 11.5
Major OS updates promised5—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare