How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO 15 Ultra vs nubia RedMagic 10SPro+

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 10SPro+

What iQOO 15 Ultra does better (11) and where nubia RedMagic 10SPro+ wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Vivo · 2026iQOO 15 Ultra
9.7Score
11 advantages≈ $790
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 10SPro+
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ $790
9.8Display9.7
9.4Camera8.9
9.7Battery9.6
9.4Features7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO 15 Ultranubia RedMagic 10SPro+
76.8 × 163.78.776.1 × 163.48.9
iQOO 15 Ultranubia RedMagic 10SPro+Difference
Height163.7 mm163.4 mm+0.3 mm
Width76.8 mm76.1 mm+0.7 mm
Thickness8.7 mm8.9 mm−0.2 mm
Weight227 g229 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO 15 Ultra better than nubia RedMagic 10SPro+?

  1. Peak brightness8,000 nits vs 2,000 nits4×
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  3. Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 10SPro+: No
  4. Wireless chargingYes · nubia RedMagic 10SPro+: No
  5. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
  6. 4K selfie videoYes · nubia RedMagic 10SPro+: No
  7. Pixel density508 ppi vs 431 ppi+18%
  8. CPU frequency4.6 GHz vs 4.47 GHz+3%
  9. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  10. Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,216 px+18%
  11. Thickness8.7 mm vs 8.9 mm+2%

Why is nubia RedMagic 10SPro+ better than iQOO 15 Ultra?

  1. Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
  2. Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  3. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · iQOO 15 Ultra: Yes
  4. Charged in 30 min62% vs 86%+39%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight227 g229 g
Thickness8.7 mm8.9 mm
Height163.7 mm163.4 mm
Width76.8 mm76.1 mm
Frame—Aluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
ColoursBlack, SilverDark Knight, White Knight, Transparent Silver Deuterium, Transparent Dark Knight
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)3,168 px2,688 px
Pixel density508 ppi431 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness8,000 nits2,000 nits
Measured brightness1,534 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio90.7%91.4%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.6 GHz4.47 GHz
GPUAdreno 840Adreno 830
AnTuTu score4,602,290—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)11,366—
Memory
RAM24 GB24 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB512 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.55"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity7,400 mAh7,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Wired charging100 W120 W
Charged in 30 min62%86%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power40 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version3.23.2
Video outputYesYes
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 6—
Major OS updates promised5—
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,200
Endurance per cycle—80 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare