How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO 13 vs 17 Pro

Vivo iQOO 13 vs Xiaomi 17 Pro

What iQOO 13 does better (7) and where 17 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO 13
Vivo · 2024iQOO 13
9.5Score
7 advantages≈ $640
vs
Xiaomi 17 Pro
Xiaomi · 202517 Pro
9.6Score
11 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
9.6Display8.8
9.3Performance9.7
9.0Camera9.8
9.5Battery9.6
9.0Features8.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO 1317 Pro
76.7 × 163.4871.8 × 151.18
iQOO 1317 ProDifference
Height163.4 mm151.1 mm+12.3 mm
Width76.7 mm71.8 mm+4.9 mm
Thickness8 mm8 mm=
Weight207 g192 g+15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO 13 better than 17 Pro?

  1. Measured brightness1,804 nits vs 1,043 nits+73%
  2. Wired charging120 W vs 100 W+20%
  3. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,500 nits+29%
  4. Pixel density510 ppi vs 464 ppi+10%
  5. Screen size6.8″ vs 6.3″+8%
  6. Charged in 30 min100% vs 70%+43%
  7. Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,220 px+18%

Why is 17 Pro better than iQOO 13?

  1. Optical zoom2× vs 5×2.5×
  2. AnTuTu score2,791,585 vs 3,569,354+28%
  3. Wireless chargingNo · iQOO 13: Yes
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,522 vs 12,033+26%
  5. Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 6,300 mAh+2%
  6. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 160 Hz+11%
  7. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  8. Weight207 g vs 192 g+8%
  9. CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+6%
  10. Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
  11. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo iQOO 13Vivo iQOO 13≈ $6409.5
Xiaomi 17 ProXiaomi 17 Pro≈ $6509.6
Design
Weight207 g192 g
Thickness8 mm8 mm
Height163.4 mm151.1 mm
Width76.7 mm71.8 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionSchott Xensation AlphaXiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass
ColoursAlpha (Black), Nardo Gray (Silver), White (BMW M branding), Ace GreenBlack, White, Purple, Green
Display
Screen size6.8″6.3″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,220 px
Resolution (height)3,168 px2,656 px
Pixel density510 ppi464 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz160 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits3,500 nits
Measured brightness1,804 nits1,043 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.2%89.5%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.32 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 840
AnTuTu score2,791,5853,569,354
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,52212,033
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,368—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.28"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom2×5×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps120 fps
Selfie camera32 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,150 mAh6,300 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)18.1 h—
Wired charging120 W100 W
Charged in 30 min100%70%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—50 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.23.2
Video outputYesYes
Ultra Wideband—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-23.8 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 15 (International)HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised4—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare