How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO 12 vs nubia RedMagic 8S Pro

Vivo iQOO 12 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 8S Pro

What iQOO 12 does better (17) and where nubia RedMagic 8S Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO 12
Vivo · 2023iQOO 12
9.1Score
17 advantages≈ $690
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
9.1Score
4 advantages≈ $700
Higher score
9.4Display8.5
8.4Performance8.2
9.2Camera7.8
7.0Battery8.9
7.8Features9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO 12nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
75.9 × 163.28.176.4 × 1649.5
iQOO 12nubia RedMagic 8S ProDifference
Height163.2 mm164 mm−0.8 mm
Width75.9 mm76.4 mm−0.5 mm
Thickness8.1 mm9.5 mm−1.4 mm
Weight198 g228 g−30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO 12 better than nubia RedMagic 8S Pro?

  1. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,300 nits2.3×
  2. Wired charging120 W vs 80 W+50%
  3. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  4. Optical stabilisationYes · nubia RedMagic 8S Pro: No
  5. Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 8S Pro: No
  6. AnTuTu score1,574,344 vs 1,326,652+19%
  7. Measured brightness1,425 nits vs 784 nits+82%
  8. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  9. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,857 vs 5,129+14%
  10. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  11. Weight198 g vs 228 g+15%
  12. Pixel density453 ppi vs 400 ppi+13%

Why is nubia RedMagic 8S Pro better than iQOO 12?

  1. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
  2. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · iQOO 12: Yes
  3. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  4. Loudspeaker loudness-25.9 LUFS vs -24.3 LUFS+-6%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo iQOO 12Vivo iQOO 12≈ $6909.1
Design
Weight198 g228 g
Thickness8.1 mm9.5 mm
Height163.2 mm164 mm
Width75.9 mm76.4 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP64—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursBlack, Red, White (BMW M branding)Midnight, Platinum, Aurora
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,116 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,480 px
Pixel density453 ppi400 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits1,300 nits
Measured brightness1,425 nits784 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.6%89.1%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.3 GHz3.36 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 740
AnTuTu score1,574,3441,326,652
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,8575,129
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,912—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.3"1/1.57"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera16 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)13.5 h—
Wired charging120 W80 W
Charged in 30 min100%86%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2 (China)
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-25.9 LUFS-24.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 15 (International)Redmagic OS 8
Major OS updates promised4—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare