- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO 11 vs Black Shark 4S Pro
Vivo iQOO 11 vs Xiaomi Black Shark 4S Pro
What iQOO 11 does better (12) and where Black Shark 4S Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display8.5
8.8Camera8.0
7.8Battery6.6
8.7Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO 11Black Shark 4S Pro
| iQOO 11 | Black Shark 4S Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.9 mm | 163.7 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 76.2 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.9 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 220 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO 11 better than Black Shark 4S Pro?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Black Shark 4S Pro: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Black Shark 4S Pro: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 1,300 nits+38%
- Pixel density518 ppi vs 395 ppi+31%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- Weight205 g vs 220 g+7%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+7%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,080 px+33%
- Process4 nm vs 5 nm+25%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 9.9 mm+18%
Why is Black Shark 4S Pro better than iQOO 11?
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Charged in 30 min120% vs 300%2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · iQOO 11: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 220 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 164.9 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Black, Green, White (BMW M branding) | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO4 AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,200 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 518 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,147 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3% | 86.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,281,665 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,803 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | 300% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 14 (International) | MIUI |
