android.gs
Compare
iQOO 11 vs 14

Vivo iQOO 11 vs Xiaomi 14

What iQOO 11 does better (7) and where 14 wins (19) — every spec side by side.

Vivo · 2022iQOO 11

9.1Score

7 advantages≈ $700

Xiaomi · 202314

9.2Score

19 advantages≈ $750

Higher score

9.3Display8.0

8.1Performance8.7

8.8Camera9.5

7.8Battery7.3

8.7Features9.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO 1114

	iQOO 11	14	Difference
Height	164.9 mm	152.8 mm	+12.1 mm
Width	77.1 mm	71.5 mm	+5.6 mm
Thickness	8.4 mm	8.2 mm	+0.2 mm
Weight	205 g	188 g	+17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO 11 better than 14?

Wired charging120 W vs 90 W+33%
Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,610 mAh+8%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Pixel density518 ppi vs 460 ppi+13%
Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+7%
Charged in 30 min120% vs 97%+24%
Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,200 px+20%

Why is 14 better than iQOO 11?

AnTuTu score1,281,665 vs 2,003,429+56%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Wireless chargingNo · iQOO 11: Yes
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,803 vs 6,810+42%
Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 3,000 nits+67%
Optical zoom2× vs 3.2×+60%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
4K selfie videoNo · iQOO 11: Yes
eSIMNo · iQOO 11: Yes
Weight205 g vs 188 g+9%
CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Vivo iQOO 11≈ $7009.1	Xiaomi 14≈ $7509.2
Design
Weight	205 g	188 g
Thickness	8.4 mm	8.2 mm
Height	164.9 mm	152.8 mm
Width	77.1 mm	71.5 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	—	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Colours	Black, Green, White (BMW M branding)	Black, White, Jade Green, Pink
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.4″
Panel	LTPO4 AMOLED	LTPO OLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,440 px	1,200 px
Resolution (height)	3,200 px	2,670 px
Pixel density	518 ppi	460 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,800 nits	3,000 nits
Measured brightness	1,147 nits	1,175 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	87.3%	89.3%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.2 GHz	3.3 GHz
GPU	Adreno 740	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	1,281,665	2,003,429
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,803	6,810
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,567
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	1/1.31"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	2×	3.2×
Max video	8K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	4,610 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	13.9 h
Wired charging	120 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	120%	97%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-26.3 LUFS	-25.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	1 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Funtouch 14 (International)	HyperOS 1.1
Major OS updates promised	—	4