- android.gs
- Compare
- Bison X10S NFC vs Poco M4 Pro 5G
Umidigi Bison X10S NFC vs Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
What Bison X10S NFC does better (2) and where Poco M4 Pro 5G wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.5Display4.8
5.2Camera6.6
6.4Battery6.0
6.6Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Bison X10S NFCPoco M4 Pro 5G
| Bison X10S NFC | Poco M4 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.1 mm | 163.6 mm | +8.5 mm |
| Width | 83.8 mm | 75.8 mm | +8 mm |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 8.8 mm | +4.1 mm |
| Weight | 279 g | 195 g | +84 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Bison X10S NFC better than Poco M4 Pro 5G?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+23%
Why is Poco M4 Pro 5G better than Bison X10S NFC?
- Main camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Wired charging10 W vs 33 W3.3×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Stereo speakersNo · Bison X10S NFC: Yes
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 399 ppi+48%
- Weight279 g vs 195 g+43%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- CPU cores4 vs 82×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 279 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 172.1 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 83.8 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Storm Grey | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 399 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 510 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 71.4% | 84.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 296,721 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,797 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 360 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 51% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.59 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 13 |
