- android.gs
- Compare
- Bison GT2 vs Poco X4 Pro 5G
Umidigi Bison GT2 vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
What Bison GT2 does better (6) and where Poco X4 Pro 5G wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.3Display8.0
7.1Camera7.1
7.3Battery7.2
7.3Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Bison GT2Poco X4 Pro 5G
| Bison GT2 | Poco X4 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.2 mm | 164.2 mm | +8 mm |
| Width | 83.9 mm | 76.1 mm | +7.8 mm |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 8.1 mm | +4.8 mm |
| Weight | 280 g | 205 g | +75 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Bison GT2 better than Poco X4 Pro 5G?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+23%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Selfie camera24 MP vs 16 MP+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Poco X4 Pro 5G better than Bison GT2?
- Wired charging18 W vs 67 W3.7×
- Main camera64 MP vs 108 MP+69%
- OLED panelNo · Bison GT2: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Bison GT2: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Weight280 g vs 205 g+37%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+7%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Thickness12.9 mm vs 8.1 mm+59%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 280 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 172.2 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 83.9 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Storm Grey | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 748 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70.6% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G95 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 335,353 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,063 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 358 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 24 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 95% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 13 for POCO |
