- android.gs
- Compare
- Bison GT2 Pro vs Poco X4 Pro 5G
Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
What Bison GT2 Pro does better (6) and where Poco X4 Pro 5G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.3Display8.0
7.1Camera7.1
7.3Battery7.2
7.3Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Bison GT2 ProPoco X4 Pro 5G
| Bison GT2 Pro | Poco X4 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.2 mm | 164.2 mm | +8 mm |
| Width | 83.9 mm | 76.1 mm | +7.8 mm |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 8.1 mm | +4.8 mm |
| Weight | 280 g | 205 g | +75 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Bison GT2 Pro better than Poco X4 Pro 5G?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+23%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Selfie camera24 MP vs 16 MP+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Poco X4 Pro 5G better than Bison GT2 Pro?
- Wired charging18 W vs 67 W3.7×
- Main camera64 MP vs 108 MP+69%
- OLED panelNo · Bison GT2 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Bison GT2 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Weight280 g vs 205 g+37%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+7%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Thickness12.9 mm vs 8.1 mm+59%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio70.6% vs 86%+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 280 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 172.2 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 83.9 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Hack Black | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 748 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70.6% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G95 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 335,353 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,063 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 358 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 24 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 95% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 13 for POCO |
