- android.gs
- Compare
- RugOne Xever 7 vs X200s
UleFone RugOne Xever 7 vs Vivo X200s
What RugOne Xever 7 does better (1) and where X200s wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display9.3
7.3Camera9.3
8.2Features9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
RugOne Xever 7X200s
| RugOne Xever 7 | X200s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 173.6 mm | 160 mm | +13.6 mm |
| Width | 84.4 mm | 74.3 mm | +10.1 mm |
| Thickness | 14.1 mm | 8 mm | +6.1 mm |
| Weight | 325 g | 203 g | +122 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is RugOne Xever 7 better than X200s?
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Why is X200s better than RugOne Xever 7?
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 5,000 nits10×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · RugOne Xever 7: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · RugOne Xever 7: Yes
- Battery capacity5,550 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+12%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Weight325 g vs 203 g+60%
- eSIMNo · RugOne Xever 7: Yes
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 460 ppi+16%
- Thickness14.1 mm vs 8 mm+76%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 325 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 14.1 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 173.6 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 84.4 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass | — |
| Colours | Black | Gray, Silver, Mint, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 90.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 3.73 GHz |
| GPU | — | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,830,117 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 9,258 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 5,777 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | — | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,550 mAh | 6,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | — | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 70% |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 40 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 15 (International) |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
