- android.gs
- Compare
- RugKing 5 Pro vs Poco M8s
UleFone RugKing 5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco M8s
What RugKing 5 Pro does better (9) and where Poco M8s wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Display8.6
6.1Camera4.6
8.8Battery8.3
6.0Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
RugKing 5 ProPoco M8s
| RugKing 5 Pro | Poco M8s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 179 mm | 169.4 mm | +9.6 mm |
| Width | 85 mm | 80.4 mm | +4.6 mm |
| Thickness | 26.5 mm | 8.4 mm | +18.1 mm |
| Weight | 629 g | 217 g | +412 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is RugKing 5 Pro better than Poco M8s?
- Battery capacity20,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh2.9×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Peak brightness910 nits vs 850 nits+7%
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 374 ppi+6%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Poco M8s better than RugKing 5 Pro?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
- Weight629 g vs 217 g2.9×
- OLED panelNo · RugKing 5 Pro: Yes
- 5GNo · RugKing 5 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · RugKing 5 Pro: Yes
- Thickness26.5 mm vs 8.4 mm3.2×
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+28%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Screen-to-body ratio71.7% vs 85.8%+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 629 g | 217 g |
| Thickness | 26.5 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 179 mm | 169.4 mm |
| Width | 85 mm | 80.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Black | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 910 nits | 850 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 71.7% | 85.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno |
| AnTuTu score | — | 615,528 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,225 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 20,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 110 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
