- android.gs
- Compare
- Power Armor 20WT vs Redmi Note 12T Pro
UleFone Power Armor 20WT vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
What Power Armor 20WT does better (5) and where Redmi Note 12T Pro wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Display7.0
5.5Camera7.2
8.7Battery8.0
8.0Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Power Armor 20WTRedmi Note 12T Pro
| Power Armor 20WT | Redmi Note 12T Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.8 mm | 163.6 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Width | 79.2 mm | 74.3 mm | +4.9 mm |
| Thickness | 18.1 mm | 8.9 mm | +9.2 mm |
| Weight | 382 g | 200 g | +182 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Power Armor 20WT better than Redmi Note 12T Pro?
- Battery capacity10,850 mAh vs 5,080 mAh2.1×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi Note 12T Pro: No
- Pixel density427 ppi vs 407 ppi+5%
Why is Redmi Note 12T Pro better than Power Armor 20WT?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
- Wired charging33 W vs 67 W2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Power Armor 20WT: Yes
- Weight382 g vs 200 g+91%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+41%
- Thickness18.1 mm vs 8.9 mm2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Power Armor 20WT: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Power Armor 20WT: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 382 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 18.1 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.8 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 79.2 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Black | Blue, White, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,160 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 427 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 650 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 63.1% | 85.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,207,095 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,222 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,703 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,850 mAh | 5,080 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, ultrasound proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 14 |
