- android.gs
- Compare
- Armor Mini 20 vs T3x
UleFone Armor Mini 20 vs Vivo T3x
What Armor Mini 20 does better (7) and where T3x wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Display6.9
5.9Camera5.4
8.2Battery8.2
7.3Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Armor Mini 20T3x
| Armor Mini 20 | T3x | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 133.5 mm | 165.7 mm | −32.2 mm |
| Width | 63.3 mm | 76 mm | −12.7 mm |
| Thickness | 24.9 mm | 8 mm | +16.9 mm |
| Weight | 301 g | 199 g | +102 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Armor Mini 20 better than T3x?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Wireless chargingYes · T3x: No
- NFCYes · T3x: No
- Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Why is T3x better than Armor Mini 20?
- Stereo speakersNo · Armor Mini 20: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Wired charging33 W vs 44 W+33%
- Weight301 g vs 199 g+51%
- Thickness24.9 mm vs 8 mm3.1×
- Screen size4.7″ vs 6.7″+43%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Pixel density373 ppi vs 393 ppi+5%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio63.1% vs 86.4%+37%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 301 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 24.9 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 133.5 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 63.3 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Black | Crimson Bliss, Celestial Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 4.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 373 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 63.1% | 86.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 733,620 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,700 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.31" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,200 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 58% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 14 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 59 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
