How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Armor 29 Pro vs X200 FE

UleFone Armor 29 Pro vs Vivo X200 FE

What Armor 29 Pro does better (7) and where X200 FE wins (14) — every spec side by side.

UleFone Armor 29 Pro
UleFone · 2025Armor 29 Pro
9.1Score
7 advantages≈ $630
vs
Vivo X200 FE
Vivo · 2025X200 FE
9.3Score
14 advantages≈ $580
Higher score
8.6Display8.3
7.3Camera8.6
9.7Battery8.9
8.4Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Armor 29 ProX200 FE
85.6 × 177.433.871.8 × 150.88
Armor 29 ProX200 FEDifference
Height177.4 mm150.8 mm+26.6 mm
Width85.6 mm71.8 mm+13.8 mm
Thickness33.8 mm8 mm+25.8 mm
Weight688 g186 g+502 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Armor 29 Pro better than X200 FE?

  1. Battery capacity21,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh3.3×
  2. Wired charging120 W vs 90 W+33%
  3. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  4. Memory card slotYes · X200 FE: No
  5. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · X200 FE: No
  6. Screen size6.7″ vs 6.3″+6%
  7. Charged in 30 min60% vs 53%+13%

Why is X200 FE better than Armor 29 Pro?

  1. Weight688 g vs 186 g3.7×
  2. Peak brightness2,200 nits vs 5,000 nits2.3×
  3. Telephoto cameraNo · Armor 29 Pro: Yes
  4. Stereo speakersNo · Armor 29 Pro: Yes
  5. Thickness33.8 mm vs 8 mm4.2×
  6. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+31%
  7. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  8. 4K selfie videoNo · Armor 29 Pro: Yes
  9. eSIMNo · Armor 29 Pro: Yes
  10. Pixel density395 ppi vs 461 ppi+17%
  11. Screen-to-body ratio70.7% vs 90.2%+28%
  12. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,216 px+13%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200 FEVivo X200 FE≈ $5809.3
Design
Weight688 g186 g
Thickness33.8 mm8 mm
Height177.4 mm150.8 mm
Width85.6 mm71.8 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Schott Xensation Core or Shield Glass
ColoursBlackLuxe Grey (Black Luxe), Frost Blue (Blue Breeze), Amber Yellow (Yellow Glow), Pink Vibe
Display
Screen size6.7″6.3″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,640 px
Pixel density395 ppi461 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,200 nits5,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,758 nits
Screen-to-body ratio70.7%90.2%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7400Mediatek Dimensity 9300+
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.6 GHz3.4 GHz
GPUMali-G615 MC2Immortalis-G720 MC12
AnTuTu score—1,805,009
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,606
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,645
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/2f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.31"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity21,200 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonSi/C
Active use (test)—15.3 h
Wired charging120 W90 W
Charged in 30 min60%53%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video output—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—Funtouch 15
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—800
Endurance per cycle—58 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare