How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Armor 29 Pro Thermal vs Poco F7

UleFone Armor 29 Pro Thermal vs Xiaomi Poco F7

What Armor 29 Pro Thermal does better (8) and where Poco F7 wins (15) — every spec side by side.

UleFone Armor 29 Pro Thermal
UleFone · 2025Armor 29 Pro Thermal
9.1Score
8 advantages≈ $640
vs
Xiaomi Poco F7
Xiaomi · 2025Poco F7
9.3Score
15 advantages≈ $620
Higher score
8.6Display9.4
7.3Camera8.8
9.7Battery8.6
8.4Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Armor 29 Pro ThermalPoco F7
85.6 × 177.433.877.9 × 163.18.2
Armor 29 Pro ThermalPoco F7Difference
Height177.4 mm163.1 mm+14.3 mm
Width85.6 mm77.9 mm+7.7 mm
Thickness33.8 mm8.2 mm+25.6 mm
Weight688 g216 g+472 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Armor 29 Pro Thermal better than Poco F7?

  1. Battery capacity21,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh3.3×
  2. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  3. Wired charging120 W vs 90 W+33%
  4. Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
  5. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  6. Memory card slotYes · Poco F7: No
  7. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco F7: No
  8. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%

Why is Poco F7 better than Armor 29 Pro Thermal?

  1. Weight688 g vs 216 g3.2×
  2. Optical stabilisationNo · Armor 29 Pro Thermal: Yes
  3. Stereo speakersNo · Armor 29 Pro Thermal: Yes
  4. Peak brightness2,200 nits vs 3,200 nits+45%
  5. Thickness33.8 mm vs 8.2 mm4.1×
  6. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.21 GHz+23%
  7. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  8. Pixel density395 ppi vs 447 ppi+13%
  9. Screen size6.7″ vs 6.8″+2%
  10. Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.5+33%
  11. Charged in 30 min60% vs 80%+33%
  12. Screen-to-body ratio70.7% vs 90.2%+28%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco F7Xiaomi Poco F7≈ $6209.3
Design
Weight688 g216 g
Thickness33.8 mm8.2 mm
Height177.4 mm163.1 mm
Width85.6 mm77.9 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursBlackBlack, White, Cyber Silver
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,280 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,772 px
Pixel density395 ppi447 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,200 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,525 nits
Screen-to-body ratio70.7%90.2%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7400Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.6 GHz3.21 GHz
GPUMali-G615 MC2Adreno 825
AnTuTu score—2,024,751
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,402
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,476
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/2f/1.5
Main sensor size1/1.31"1/1.95"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity21,200 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonSi/C
Active use (test)—14.8 h
Wired charging120 W90 W
Charged in 30 min60%80%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—64 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—D
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare