How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Armor 27T Pro+ vs Poco M8

UleFone Armor 27T Pro+ vs Xiaomi Poco M8

What Armor 27T Pro+ does better (9) and where Poco M8 wins (11) — every spec side by side.

UleFone Armor 27T Pro+
UleFone · 2026Armor 27T Pro+
8.1Score
9 advantages
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco M8
Xiaomi · 2026Poco M8
8.0Score
11 advantages≈ $250
6.8Display8.5
5.9Camera6.3
9.1Battery7.6
7.6Features7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Armor 27T Pro+Poco M8
86.8 × 182.818.575.4 × 1647.4
Armor 27T Pro+Poco M8Difference
Height182.8 mm164 mm+18.8 mm
Width86.8 mm75.4 mm+11.4 mm
Thickness18.5 mm7.4 mm+11.1 mm
Weight441 g178 g+263 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Armor 27T Pro+ better than Poco M8?

  1. Battery capacity10,600 mAh vs 5,520 mAh+92%
  2. RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
  3. Wireless chargingYes · Poco M8: No
  4. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
  5. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  6. Rear cameras2 vs 12×
  7. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco M8: No
  8. Pixel density396 ppi vs 388 ppi+2%
  9. Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%

Why is Poco M8 better than Armor 27T Pro+?

  1. Peak brightness680 nits vs 3,200 nits4.7×
  2. Weight441 g vs 178 g2.5×
  3. OLED panelNo · Armor 27T Pro+: Yes
  4. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  5. Stereo speakersNo · Armor 27T Pro+: Yes
  6. Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
  7. Thickness18.5 mm vs 7.4 mm2.5×
  8. Max video1080p vs 4K
  9. Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
  10. Screen-to-body ratio68.8% vs 89.7%+30%
  11. Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco M8Xiaomi Poco M8≈ $2508.0
Design
Weight441 g178 g
Thickness18.5 mm7.4 mm
Height182.8 mm164 mm
Width86.8 mm75.4 mm
Frame—Plastic
Back—Plastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP66
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx6
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus—
ColoursBlackBlack, Green, Silver
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelIPS LCDAMOLED
OLED panelNoYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,460 px2,392 px
Pixel density396 ppi388 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness680 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,473 nits
Screen-to-body ratio68.8%89.7%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6300Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 710
AnTuTu score—631,693
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—2,898
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—866
Memory
RAM12 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/2f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.31"1/2.88"
Rear cameras21
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video1080p4K
4K video frame rate—30 fps
Selfie camera32 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity10,600 mAh5,520 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)—13.9 h
Wired charging33 W45 W
Charged in 30 min—55%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.1
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-23.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—50 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare