- android.gs
- Compare
- Armor 27T+ vs Poco M8 Power
UleFone Armor 27T+ vs Xiaomi Poco M8 Power
What Armor 27T+ does better (10) and where Poco M8 Power wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display8.5
5.9Camera4.6
9.1Battery9.0
7.3Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Armor 27T+Poco M8 Power
| Armor 27T+ | Poco M8 Power | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 182.8 mm | 169.7 mm | +13.1 mm |
| Width | 86.8 mm | 79.1 mm | +7.7 mm |
| Thickness | 18.5 mm | 8.5 mm | +10 mm |
| Weight | 441 g | 225 g | +216 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Armor 27T+ better than Poco M8 Power?
- Battery capacity10,600 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+32%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Wireless chargingYes · Poco M8 Power: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco M8 Power: No
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 375 ppi+6%
Why is Poco M8 Power better than Armor 27T+?
- OLED panelNo · Armor 27T+: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Armor 27T+: Yes
- Weight441 g vs 225 g+96%
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Thickness18.5 mm vs 8.5 mm2.2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+5%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 7″+3%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio68.8% vs 88.4%+28%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 441 g | 225 g |
| Thickness | 18.5 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 182.8 mm | 169.7 mm |
| Width | 86.8 mm | 79.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black | Black, Green, Blaze Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,396 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 375 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 68.8% | 88.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM4450-AF Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 611,651 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,328 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.31" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,600 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
