android.gs
Compare
Armor 27 vs Poco X6 Pro

UleFone Armor 27 vs Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro

What Armor 27 does better (7) and where Poco X6 Pro wins (16) — every spec side by side.

UleFone · 2024Armor 27

8.3Score

7 advantages≈ $370

Xiaomi · 2024Poco X6 Pro

8.4Score

16 advantages≈ $360

Higher score

7.2Display8.6

6.8Camera8.4

9.1Battery5.3

7.3Features6.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

Armor 27Poco X6 Pro

	Armor 27	Poco X6 Pro	Difference
Height	182.8 mm	160.5 mm	+22.3 mm
Width	86.8 mm	74.3 mm	+12.5 mm
Thickness	18.5 mm	8.3 mm	+10.2 mm
Weight	441 g	186 g	+255 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Armor 27 better than Poco X6 Pro?

Battery capacity10,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2.1×
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Wireless chargingYes · Poco X6 Pro: No
Memory card slotYes · Poco X6 Pro: No
Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco X6 Pro: No
Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%

Why is Poco X6 Pro better than Armor 27?

Wired charging33 W vs 67 W2×
Weight441 g vs 186 g2.4×
OLED panelNo · Armor 27: Yes
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · Armor 27: Yes
Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+52%
Thickness18.5 mm vs 8.3 mm2.2×
Max video1080p vs 4K
Pixel density396 ppi vs 446 ppi+13%
Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Screen-to-body ratio68.8% vs 90.1%+31%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	UleFone Armor 27≈ $3708.3	Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro≈ $3608.4
Design
Weight	441 g	186 g
Thickness	18.5 mm	8.3 mm
Height	182.8 mm	160.5 mm
Width	86.8 mm	74.3 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IP68	IP54
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx4
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Black	Black, Yellow, Gray
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,220 px
Resolution (height)	2,460 px	2,712 px
Pixel density	396 ppi	446 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	1,800 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,148 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	68.8%	90.1%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G99	Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	3.35 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali G615-MC6
AnTuTu score	—	1,396,547
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	4,696
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	64 MP
Main camera aperture	f/2	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.31"	1/2.0"
Rear cameras	3	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	4K
4K video frame rate	—	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,600 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.8 h
Wired charging	33 W	67 W
Charged in 30 min	—	67%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	30 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	—	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	—	3
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	112 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	A	—