- android.gs
- Compare
- Armor 24 Pro vs Redmi Note 17 (India/China)
UleFone Armor 24 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 (India/China)
What Armor 24 Pro does better (11) and where Redmi Note 17 (India/China) wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Display9.0
6.1Camera4.6
9.4Battery9.0
8.3Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Armor 24 ProRedmi Note 17 (India/China)
| Armor 24 Pro | Redmi Note 17 (India/China) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 181.2 mm | 169.7 mm | +11.5 mm |
| Width | 87 mm | 79.1 mm | +7.9 mm |
| Thickness | 27.5 mm | 8.4 mm | +19.1 mm |
| Weight | 647 g | 225 g | +422 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Armor 24 Pro better than Redmi Note 17 (India/China)?
- Battery capacity22,000 mAh vs 8,000 mAh2.8×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Wired charging66 W vs 45 W+47%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- eSIMYes · Redmi Note 17 (India/China): No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi Note 17 (India/China): No
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 375 ppi+6%
Why is Redmi Note 17 (India/China) better than Armor 24 Pro?
- Weight647 g vs 225 g2.9×
- Peak brightness460 nits vs 1,800 nits3.9×
- OLED panelNo · Armor 24 Pro: Yes
- Thickness27.5 mm vs 8.4 mm3.3×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+5%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 7″+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio69.2% vs 88.4%+28%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 647 g | 225 g |
| Thickness | 27.5 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 181.2 mm | 169.7 mm |
| Width | 87 mm | 79.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black | Black, Purple, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | OLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,396 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 375 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 460 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 69.2% | 88.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 | Qualcomm SM4450-AF Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 22,000 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 167 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
