- android.gs
- Compare
- Armor 22 Pro vs Redmi 17 5G
UleFone Armor 22 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 17 5G
What Armor 22 Pro does better (8) and where Redmi 17 5G wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Display6.4
5.4Camera4.6
8.2Battery8.9
6.7Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Armor 22 ProRedmi 17 5G
| Armor 22 Pro | Redmi 17 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 176.8 mm | 170.1 mm | +6.7 mm |
| Width | 84.9 mm | 78.4 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 8.8 mm | +6.2 mm |
| Weight | 324 g | 232 g | +92 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Armor 22 Pro better than Redmi 17 5G?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Pixel density401 ppi vs 254 ppi+58%
- eSIMYes · Redmi 17 5G: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi 17 5G: No
- Drop resistance classA vs B
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is Redmi 17 5G better than Armor 22 Pro?
- 5GNo · Armor 22 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Armor 22 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity6,600 mAh vs 7,500 mAh+14%
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 825 nits+83%
- Weight324 g vs 232 g+40%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Thickness15 mm vs 8.8 mm+70%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.9″+5%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio69.5% vs 86.1%+24%
- Endurance per cycle73 h vs 78 h+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 324 g | 232 g |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 176.8 mm | 170.1 mm |
| Width | 84.9 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black | Black, Blue, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 825 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 69.5% | 86.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 619,773 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,241 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/3.06" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,600 mAh | 7,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | proximity, accelerometer, light, compass, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 73 h | 78 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | B |
