- android.gs
- Compare
- Armor 17 Pro vs Poco X4 GT
UleFone Armor 17 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
What Armor 17 Pro does better (8) and where Poco X4 GT wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display7.0
7.1Camera7.2
8.3Battery8.0
6.0Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Armor 17 ProPoco X4 GT
| Armor 17 Pro | Poco X4 GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.7 mm | 163.6 mm | +9.1 mm |
| Width | 80.4 mm | 74.3 mm | +6.1 mm |
| Thickness | 12.5 mm | 8.9 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Weight | 290 g | 200 g | +90 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Armor 17 Pro better than Poco X4 GT?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Wireless chargingYes · Poco X4 GT: No
- Battery capacity5,380 mAh vs 5,080 mAh+6%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · Poco X4 GT: No
- Charged in 30 min106% vs 65%+63%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Why is Poco X4 GT better than Armor 17 Pro?
- 5GNo · Armor 17 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Armor 17 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Weight290 g vs 200 g+45%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.85 GHz+30%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Thickness12.5 mm vs 8.9 mm+40%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio75.1% vs 85.1%+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 290 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 12.5 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 172.7 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 80.4 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 650 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75.1% | 85.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.85 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 747,871 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,719 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,518 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,380 mAh | 5,080 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 106% | 65% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 13 for POCO |
