- android.gs
- Compare
- Spark Slim vs V50 Lite 4G
Tecno Spark Slim vs Vivo V50 Lite 4G
What Spark Slim does better (8) and where V50 Lite 4G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display8.6
5.2Camera5.9
7.8Battery9.2
4.1Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Spark SlimV50 Lite 4G
| Spark Slim | V50 Lite 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 163.8 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.3 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 7.8 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 196 g | −40 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Spark Slim better than V50 Lite 4G?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits2.5×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Weight156 g vs 196 g+26%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 388 ppi+13%
- Thickness5.9 mm vs 7.8 mm+32%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is V50 Lite 4G better than Spark Slim?
- Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+26%
- Stereo speakersNo · Spark Slim: Yes
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+27%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Memory card slotNo · Spark Slim: Yes
- Dual SIMNo · Spark Slim: Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Charged in 30 min53% vs 56%+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 156 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Slim White, Cool Black | Blue/Silver, Violet, Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1% | 88.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 591,552 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,985 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 53% | 56% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | Funtouch 15 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 58 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
