- android.gs
- Compare
- Spark Go 3 vs Redmi 17C 4G
Tecno Spark Go 3 vs Xiaomi Redmi 17C 4G
What Spark Go 3 does better (4) and where Redmi 17C 4G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Display5.9
2.4Performance2.5
3.4Camera2.7
4.0Battery6.3
3.2Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Spark Go 3Redmi 17C 4G
| Spark Go 3 | Redmi 17C 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.7 mm | 171.9 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Width | 77.8 mm | 77.8 mm | = |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 182 g | 206 g | −24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Spark Go 3 better than Redmi 17C 4G?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,416 vs 1,377+3%
- Weight182 g vs 206 g+13%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2.2+22%
Why is Redmi 17C 4G better than Spark Go 3?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 600 nits+20%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz+11%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+2%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 182 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 167.7 mm | 171.9 mm |
| Width | 77.8 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Titanium Grey, Ink Black, Galaxy Blue, Aurora Purple | Black, Red, Light blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 84% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 363,747 | 364,670 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,416 | 1,377 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 37% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | HyperOS 3 |
