- android.gs
- Compare
- Spark 50 Pro vs Poco C95 Pro
Tecno Spark 50 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro
What Spark 50 Pro does better (6) and where Poco C95 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display6.4
4.6Camera4.6
8.4Battery8.9
6.7Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Spark 50 ProPoco C95 Pro
| Spark 50 Pro | Poco C95 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.8 mm | 170.1 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Width | 79.2 mm | 78.4 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.8 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 207 g | 232 g | −25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Spark 50 Pro better than Poco C95 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Wired charging60 W vs 45 W+33%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Weight207 g vs 232 g+12%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.8 mm+13%
Why is Poco C95 Pro better than Spark 50 Pro?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 7,500 mAh+25%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Spark 50 Pro: Yes
- Screen-to-body ratio83.5% vs 86.2%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 207 g | 232 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 167.8 mm | 170.1 mm |
| Width | 79.2 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Ink Black, Titanium Grey, Midnight Blue, Dynamic Orange, Cloud White | Green, Blue, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 259 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 825 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.5% | 86.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate | Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 580,813 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,569 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 7,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 60 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 63% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | HyperOS 3 |
