- android.gs
- Compare
- Spark 40 Pro+ vs Spark Slim
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ vs Tecno Spark Slim
What Spark 40 Pro+ does better (5) and where Spark Slim wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display9.8
3.8Performance4.6
5.2Camera5.2
6.4Battery7.8
5.5Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Spark 40 Pro+Spark Slim
| Spark 40 Pro+ | Spark Slim | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75.9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm | 5.9 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 160 g | 156 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Spark 40 Pro+ better than Spark Slim?
- Wireless chargingYes · Spark Slim: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Spark Slim: No
- Dual SIMYes · Spark Slim: No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Charged in 30 min55% vs 53%+4%
Why is Spark Slim better than Spark 40 Pro+?
- AnTuTu score455,013 vs 591,552+30%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,903 vs 1,985+4%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight160 g vs 156 g+3%
- Thickness6.5 mm vs 5.9 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 160 g | 156 g |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm | 5.9 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Nebula Black, Aurora White, Moon Titanium, Tundra Green | Slim White, Cool Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,601 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 89.1% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 | Mediatek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 455,013 | 591,552 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,903 | 1,985 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 378 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 10.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | 53% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15.1 | HIOS 15 |
