- android.gs
- Compare
- Spark 30 vs Poco C75 5G
Tecno Spark 30 vs Xiaomi Poco C75 5G
What Spark 30 does better (12) and where Poco C75 5G wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Display5.9
3.0Performance3.4
5.7Camera4.1
4.6Battery6.3
4.6Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Spark 30Poco C75 5G
| Spark 30 | Poco C75 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168 mm | 171.9 mm | −3.9 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77.8 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 212 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Spark 30 better than Poco C75 5G?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- NFCYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 260 ppi+52%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 5 MP2.6×
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 600 nits+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Weight193 g vs 212 g+10%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.2 mm+6%
Why is Poco C75 5G better than Spark 30?
- 5GNo · Spark 30: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,442 vs 2,014+40%
- AnTuTu score354,158 vs 391,505+11%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- Process12 nm vs 4 nm3×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 212 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 168 mm | 171.9 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Stellar Shadow, Astral Ice, Magic Skin 3.0, Bumblebee Edition | Aqua Bliss, Enchanted Green, Silver Stardust |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85% | 84% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G91 | Qualcomm SM4635 Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 611 |
| AnTuTu score | 354,158 | 391,505 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,442 | 2,014 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 141 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.85 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14.5 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
