- android.gs
- Compare
- Spark 20 Pro+ vs Blade V70 Design
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ vs ZTE Blade V70 Design
What Spark 20 Pro+ does better (12) and where Blade V70 Design wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Display6.0
6.6Camera5.5
4.2Battery5.1
4.6Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Spark 20 Pro+Blade V70 Design
| Spark 20 Pro+ | Blade V70 Design | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.7 mm | 165.8 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 77.1 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 206 g | −27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Spark 20 Pro+ better than Blade V70 Design?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- OLED panelYes · Blade V70 Design: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Blade V70 Design: No
- Wired charging33 W vs 22 W+47%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 264 ppi+49%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+38%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight179 g vs 206 g+15%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.2 mm+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio89% vs 84.4%+5%
Why is Blade V70 Design better than Spark 20 Pro+?
- Memory card slotNo · Spark 20 Pro+: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Spark 20 Pro+: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164.7 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 77.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Temporal Orbits, Lunar Frost, Radiant Starstream, Magic Skin 2.0 Green | Stone gray, Rose pink, Citrus orange, Jade green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 264 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 549 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89% | 84.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | Unisoc T606 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 386,262 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,787 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 347 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 11.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 54% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.2 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | C |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 41 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | D |
