- android.gs
- Compare
- Spark 20 Pro+ vs Blade A75
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ vs ZTE Blade A75
What Spark 20 Pro+ does better (14) and where Blade A75 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Display5.7
6.6Camera5.4
4.2Battery4.6
4.6Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Spark 20 Pro+Blade A75
| Spark 20 Pro+ | Blade A75 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.7 mm | 163.6 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 74.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.6 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 206 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Spark 20 Pro+ better than Blade A75?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- OLED panelYes · Blade A75: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Blade A75: No
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 266 ppi+48%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight179 g vs 206 g+15%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is Blade A75 better than Spark 20 Pro+?
- 5GNo · Spark 20 Pro+: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Spark 20 Pro+: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 164.7 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Temporal Orbits, Lunar Frost, Radiant Starstream, Magic Skin 2.0 Green | Black, Mint Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 266 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 549 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | Unisoc T760 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 |
| AnTuTu score | 386,262 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,787 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 347 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 11.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 54% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.2 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | — |
