- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova Curve vs Spark 40 Pro
Tecno Pova Curve vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro
What Pova Curve does better (11) and where Spark 40 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display9.8
6.4Performance4.5
6.3Camera5.2
8.0Battery7.9
7.5Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova CurveSpark 40 Pro
| Pova Curve | Spark 40 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.3 mm | 163.7 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.9 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 6.7 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 170 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova Curve better than Spark 40 Pro?
- AnTuTu score906,240 vs 584,885+55%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,097 vs 1,979+56%
- 5GYes · Spark 40 Pro: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+6%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Spark 40 Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- Charged in 30 min100% vs 62%+61%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Spark 40 Pro better than Pova Curve?
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 4,500 nits3.5×
- Memory card slotNo · Pova Curve: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Pova Curve: Yes
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 440 ppi+12%
- Weight188 g vs 170 g+11%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 6.7 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 170 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 6.7 mm |
| Height | 164.3 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Neon Cyan, Magic Silver, Geek Black | Ink Black, Moon Titanium, Lake Blue, Bamboo Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 89.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 906,240 | 584,885 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,097 | 1,979 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | HIOS 15.1 |
