- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova 8 vs Z-Slim
Tecno Pova 8 vs ZEED Z-Slim
What Pova 8 does better (2) and where Z-Slim wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 8Z-Slim
| Pova 8 | Z-Slim | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.7 mm | 162.6 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Width | 78.5 mm | 75.4 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 6 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Weight | 225 g | 172 g | +53 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 8 better than Z-Slim?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 60 Hz2.4×
- Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+60%
Why is Z-Slim better than Pova 8?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- OLED panelNo · Pova 8: Yes
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Weight225 g vs 172 g+31%
- eSIMNo · Pova 8: Yes
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 6 mm+47%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.6% vs 90.5%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 225 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 6 mm |
| Height | 165.7 mm | 162.6 mm |
| Width | 78.5 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation Up |
| Colours | Arc White, Graphite Black, Helios Orange, Echo Green, Bit White (India), Terminal Green (India) | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,344 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 381 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 991 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.6% | 90.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 666,199 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,914 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 695 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 17.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 43% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.8 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | — |
