- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova 7 Ultra vs Redmi Note 14 Pro
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro
What Pova 7 Ultra does better (12) and where Redmi Note 14 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display8.8
7.8Camera8.2
9.1Battery8.0
6.4Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 7 UltraRedmi Note 14 Pro
| Pova 7 Ultra | Redmi Note 14 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160 mm | 162.3 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 74.4 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 201 g | 190 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 7 Ultra better than Redmi Note 14 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Wired charging70 W vs 45 W+56%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Wireless chargingYes · Redmi Note 14 Pro: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+9%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+50%
- CPU frequency3.35 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+34%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi Note 14 Pro: No
- Pixel density460 ppi vs 446 ppi+3%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,220 px+3%
Why is Redmi Note 14 Pro better than Pova 7 Ultra?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Pova 7 Ultra: Yes
- eSIMNo · Pova 7 Ultra: Yes
- Weight201 g vs 190 g+6%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 20 MP+54%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 6+50%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 8.2 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 201 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 160 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Geek White, Geek Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | — |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.35 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Mali G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,771,444 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,914 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.5 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 83% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
