- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova 7 Pro vs Y400 4G
Tecno Pova 7 Pro vs Vivo Y400 4G
What Pova 7 Pro does better (16) and where Y400 4G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display8.4
7.0Camera4.6
8.7Battery8.2
7.5Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 7 ProY400 4G
| Pova 7 Pro | Y400 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 162.3 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75.3 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 196 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 7 Pro better than Y400 4G?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits2.5×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Wireless chargingYes · Y400 4G: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y400 4G: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Y400 4G: No
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 395 ppi+11%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
Why is Y400 4G better than Pova 7 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+12%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.9 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Geek Black, Dynamic Grey, Neon Cyan | Purple Twilight, Tropical Green (Dynamic Green), Pearl White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 87.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 933,528 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,091 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/2.96" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 58% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | Funtouch 15 |
