android.gs
Compare
Pova 6 vs X200

Tecno Pova 6 vs Vivo X200

What Pova 6 does better (3) and where X200 wins (24) — every spec side by side.

Tecno · 2024Pova 6

7.7Score

3 advantages≈ $530

Vivo · 2024X200

9.5Score

24 advantages≈ $530

Higher score

8.7Display9.2

4.8Performance9.2

6.6Camera9.3

8.7Battery8.3

4.2Features9.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Pova 6X200

	Pova 6	X200	Difference
Height	166.2 mm	160.3 mm	+5.9 mm
Width	76.8 mm	74.8 mm	+2 mm
Thickness	7.9 mm	8 mm	−0.1 mm
Weight	195 g	197 g	−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pova 6 better than X200?

Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,800 mAh+3%
3.5 mm headphone jackYes · X200: No

Why is X200 better than Pova 6?

AnTuTu score575,538 vs 2,632,8744.6×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,970 vs 8,0144.1×
Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx82.7×
Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 4,500 nits3.5×
Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
Optical stabilisationNo · Pova 6: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · Pova 6: Yes
5GNo · Pova 6: Yes
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
Wired charging70 W vs 90 W+29%
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+65%
Rear cameras1 vs 33×

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Tecno Pova 6≈ $5307.7	Vivo X200≈ $5309.5
Design
Weight	195 g	197 g
Thickness	7.9 mm	8 mm
Height	166.2 mm	160.3 mm
Width	76.8 mm	74.8 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Plastic	Glass
Ingress protection	IP53	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx3	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Schott Xensation Alpha
Colours	Interstellar Blue, Comet Green, Meteorite Grey	Natural Green (Aurora Green), Cosmos Black, Blue, White, Titanium
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,260 px
Resolution (height)	2,460 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	396 ppi	460 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,300 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,563 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	85.5%	89.6%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate	Mediatek Dimensity 9400
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	3.63 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score	575,538	2,632,874
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	1,970	8,014
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	6,334
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	108 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.7	f/1.6
Main sensor size	—	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	1	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	1080p	4K
4K video frame rate	—	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	6,000 mAh	5,800 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	14.8 h
Wired charging	70 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	75%	78%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 4	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Video output	—	Yes
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	1 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	HIOS 14	Funtouch 15 (International)
Major OS updates promised	—	4