- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova 6 vs V40 Pro
Tecno Pova 6 vs Vivo V40 Pro
What Pova 6 does better (5) and where V40 Pro wins (21) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 6V40 Pro
| Pova 6 | V40 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.2 mm | 164.4 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 75.1 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 192 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 6 better than V40 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+9%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · V40 Pro: No
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
- Charged in 30 min75% vs 73%+3%
Why is V40 Pro better than Pova 6?
- AnTuTu score575,538 vs 1,504,7982.6×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,970 vs 5,1492.6×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx82.7×
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 4,500 nits3.5×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Pova 6: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Pova 6: Yes
- 5GNo · Pova 6: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+52%
- Wired charging70 W vs 80 W+14%
- Rear cameras1 vs 33×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Pova 6: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 166.2 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Interstellar Blue, Comet Green, Meteorite Grey | Ganges Blue, Titanium Gray, Moonlight White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,307 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5% | 89.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| AnTuTu score | 575,538 | 1,504,798 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,970 | 5,149 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,908 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.8 h |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | 73% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | Funtouch 14 |
