- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova 5 Pro vs iQOO Z7
Tecno Pova 5 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z7
What Pova 5 Pro does better (8) and where iQOO Z7 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.5Display7.3
5.5Camera7.9
7.3Battery4.8
8.1Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 5 ProiQOO Z7
| Pova 5 Pro | iQOO Z7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.5 mm | 158.9 mm | +9.6 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 73.5 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 7.8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 212 g | 173 g | +39 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 5 Pro better than iQOO Z7?
- Wired charging68 W vs 44 W+55%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- NFCYes · iQOO Z7: No
- Stereo speakersYes · iQOO Z7: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+6%
- Charged in 30 min100% vs 60%+67%
Why is iQOO Z7 better than Pova 5 Pro?
- Peak brightness580 nits vs 1,300 nits2.2×
- OLED panelNo · Pova 5 Pro: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Pova 5 Pro: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Weight212 g vs 173 g+23%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 413 ppi+4%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Thickness9 mm vs 7.8 mm+15%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 168.5 mm | 158.9 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation glass |
| Colours | Dark Illusion, Silver Fantasy, Free Fire Edition | Norway Blue, Pacific Night |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 580 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 509 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 84.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 | Mediatek Dimensity 920 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 389,037 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,884 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | — |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | 60% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.15 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | Funtouch 14 |
