- android.gs
- Compare
- Phantom X vs Redmi K40 Pro+
Tecno Phantom X vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+
What Phantom X does better (8) and where Redmi K40 Pro+ wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display7.9
7.9Camera8.3
4.3Battery4.2
3.5Features7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phantom XRedmi K40 Pro+
| Phantom X | Redmi K40 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 163.7 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 76.4 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 201 g | 196 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phantom X better than Redmi K40 Pro+?
- Telephoto cameraYes · Redmi K40 Pro+: No
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,520 mAh+4%
- Selfie camera48 MP vs 20 MP2.4×
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K40 Pro+: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi K40 Pro+: No
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Charged in 30 min70% vs 58%+21%
- Screen-to-body ratio91.3% vs 85.9%+6%
Why is Redmi K40 Pro+ better than Phantom X?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- 5GNo · Phantom X: Yes
- NFCNo · Phantom X: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Phantom X: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Process12 nm vs 5 nm2.4×
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+39%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Weight201 g vs 196 g+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6E+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 201 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Starry Night Blue, Monet Summer | Black, White, Aurora |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 405 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.3% | 85.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | 309,055 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,670 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 48 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,520 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 70% | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HiOS 7.6 | MIUI 12 |
