- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon Slim 4G vs Redmi 17
Tecno Camon Slim 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi 17
What Camon Slim 4G does better (10) and where Redmi 17 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display6.4
5.9Camera4.6
8.2Battery8.9
5.8Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon Slim 4GRedmi 17
| Camon Slim 4G | Redmi 17 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 170.1 mm | −7.3 mm |
| Width | 77.7 mm | 78.4 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 6.4 mm | 8.8 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Weight | 168 g | 232 g | −64 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon Slim 4G better than Redmi 17?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- OLED panelYes · Redmi 17: No
- Wired charging60 W vs 45 W+33%
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 254 ppi+73%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Weight168 g vs 232 g+38%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 720 px+70%
- Thickness6.4 mm vs 8.8 mm+38%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
Why is Redmi 17 better than Camon Slim 4G?
- Battery capacity5,600 mAh vs 7,500 mAh+34%
- 5GNo · Camon Slim 4G: Yes
- Dual SIMNo · Camon Slim 4G: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Camon Slim 4G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 168 g | 232 g |
| Thickness | 6.4 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 170.1 mm |
| Width | 77.7 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | New Mondrian, Prism Black, Jungle Green, Van Gogh Blue, Burgundy Red | Absolute Black, Deep Blue (Endless Blue), Vivid Orange (Eternal Orange) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 825 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.7% | 86.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 576,430 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,838 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,600 mAh | 7,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 60 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16.2 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
