- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon Slim 4G vs Poco M8s
Tecno Camon Slim 4G vs Xiaomi Poco M8s
What Camon Slim 4G does better (9) and where Poco M8s wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display8.6
4.3Performance5.0
5.9Camera4.6
8.2Battery8.3
5.8Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon Slim 4GPoco M8s
| Camon Slim 4G | Poco M8s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 169.4 mm | −6.6 mm |
| Width | 77.7 mm | 80.4 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 6.4 mm | 8.4 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 168 g | 217 g | −49 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon Slim 4G better than Poco M8s?
- Wired charging60 W vs 33 W+82%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Weight168 g vs 217 g+29%
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 374 ppi+18%
- Thickness6.4 mm vs 8.4 mm+31%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.7% vs 85.8%+2%
Why is Poco M8s better than Camon Slim 4G?
- Battery capacity5,600 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+25%
- 5GNo · Camon Slim 4G: Yes
- AnTuTu score576,430 vs 615,528+7%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,838 vs 2,225+21%
- Dual SIMNo · Camon Slim 4G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 168 g | 217 g |
| Thickness | 6.4 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 169.4 mm |
| Width | 77.7 mm | 80.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Colours | New Mondrian, Prism Black, Jungle Green, Van Gogh Blue, Burgundy Red | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 850 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.7% | 85.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno |
| AnTuTu score | 576,430 | 615,528 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,838 | 2,225 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,600 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 60 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16.2 | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
