How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Camon Slim 4G vs Poco M8

Tecno Camon Slim 4G vs Xiaomi Poco M8

What Camon Slim 4G does better (9) and where Poco M8 wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Tecno Camon Slim 4G
Tecno · 2026Camon Slim 4G
7.9Score
9 advantages
vs
Xiaomi Poco M8
Xiaomi · 2026Poco M8
8.0Score
11 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
9.7Display8.5
4.3Performance5.5
5.9Camera6.3
8.2Battery7.6
5.8Features7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Camon Slim 4GPoco M8
77.7 × 162.86.475.4 × 1647.4
Camon Slim 4GPoco M8Difference
Height162.8 mm164 mm−1.2 mm
Width77.7 mm75.4 mm+2.3 mm
Thickness6.4 mm7.4 mm−1 mm
Weight168 g178 g−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Camon Slim 4G better than Poco M8?

  1. Wired charging60 W vs 45 W+33%
  2. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  3. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
  4. Pixel density440 ppi vs 388 ppi+13%
  5. Weight168 g vs 178 g+6%
  6. Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
  7. Thickness6.4 mm vs 7.4 mm+16%
  8. Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
  9. Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%

Why is Poco M8 better than Camon Slim 4G?

  1. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,838 vs 2,898+58%
  2. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  3. 5GNo · Camon Slim 4G: Yes
  4. AnTuTu score576,430 vs 631,693+10%
  5. Major OS updates promised3 vs 4+33%
  6. Max video1080p vs 4K
  7. Dual SIMNo · Camon Slim 4G: Yes
  8. CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
  9. Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
  10. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
  11. Screen-to-body ratio87.7% vs 89.7%+2%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco M8Xiaomi Poco M8≈ $2508.0
Design
Weight168 g178 g
Thickness6.4 mm7.4 mm
Height162.8 mm164 mm
Width77.7 mm75.4 mm
FramePlasticPlastic
BackPlasticPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP66
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx6
ColoursNew Mondrian, Prism Black, Jungle Green, Van Gogh Blue, Burgundy RedBlack, Green, Silver
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,720 px2,392 px
Pixel density440 ppi388 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,473 nits
Screen-to-body ratio87.7%89.7%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G200 UltimateQualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 710
AnTuTu score576,430631,693
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,8382,898
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—866
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/2.88"
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video1080p4K
4K video frame rate—30 fps
Selfie camera32 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,600 mAh5,520 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)—13.9 h
Wired charging60 W45 W
Charged in 30 min—55%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35.1
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-23.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHIOS 16.2HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised34
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—50 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare