- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 50 Ultra vs Z-Pro Max
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs ZEED Z-Pro Max
What Camon 50 Ultra does better (21) and where Z-Pro Max wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display7.4
9.1Camera5.8
8.5Battery8.1
8.5Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 50 UltraZ-Pro Max
| Camon 50 Ultra | Z-Pro Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 169.4 mm | −7 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 80.5 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 178 g | 221 g | −43 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 50 Ultra better than Z-Pro Max?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- OLED panelYes · Z-Pro Max: No
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Z-Pro Max: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Z-Pro Max: No
- Battery capacity6,160 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Wired charging45 W vs 40 W+12%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Weight178 g vs 221 g+24%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
Why is Z-Pro Max better than Camon 50 Ultra?
- Memory card slotNo · Camon 50 Ultra: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Camon 50 Ultra: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 221 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 169.4 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Oleophobic coating |
| Colours | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Luminous Orange, Misty Purple | Orange, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,302 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 85.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 804,875 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,134 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,050 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,160 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 16 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 40 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 42% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.44 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
