How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Camon 50 Ultra vs Poco X8 Pro Max

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max

What Camon 50 Ultra does better (8) and where Poco X8 Pro Max wins (16) — every spec side by side.

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Tecno · 2026Camon 50 Ultra
9.1Score
8 advantages≈ $480
vs
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max
Xiaomi · 2026Poco X8 Pro Max
9.6Score
16 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
9.5Display9.4
6.7Performance9.0
9.1Camera8.8
8.5Battery9.7
8.5Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Camon 50 UltraPoco X8 Pro Max
77 × 162.47.877.9 × 162.98.2
Camon 50 UltraPoco X8 Pro MaxDifference
Height162.4 mm162.9 mm−0.5 mm
Width77 mm77.9 mm−0.9 mm
Thickness7.8 mm8.2 mm−0.4 mm
Weight178 g218 g−40 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Camon 50 Ultra better than Poco X8 Pro Max?

  1. Telephoto cameraYes · Poco X8 Pro Max: No
  2. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  3. Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
  4. Weight178 g vs 218 g+22%
  5. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco X8 Pro Max: No
  6. Measured brightness1,302 nits vs 1,114 nits+17%
  7. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  8. Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.2 mm+5%

Why is Poco X8 Pro Max better than Camon 50 Ultra?

  1. AnTuTu score804,875 vs 2,445,1083×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,134 vs 8,5392.7×
  3. Wired charging45 W vs 100 W2.2×
  4. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,050 vs 6,2295.9×
  5. Battery capacity6,160 mAh vs 8,500 mAh+38%
  6. Active use (test)16 h vs 25.4 h+59%
  7. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.73 GHz+43%
  8. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  9. Pixel density429 ppi vs 447 ppi+4%
  10. Charged in 30 min42% vs 62%+48%
  11. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  12. Loudspeaker loudness-25.4 LUFS vs -20.9 LUFS+-18%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight178 g218 g
Thickness7.8 mm8.2 mm
Height162.4 mm162.9 mm
Width77 mm77.9 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iCorning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursMoonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Luminous Orange, Misty PurpleBlack, White, Blue
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,208 px1,280 px
Resolution (height)2,644 px2,772 px
Pixel density429 ppi447 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—3,500 nits
Measured brightness1,302 nits1,114 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.6%90.3%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7400 UltimateMediatek Dimensity 9500s
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.6 GHz3.73 GHz
GPUMali-G615 MC2Immortalis-G925 MC11
AnTuTu score804,8752,445,108
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,1348,539
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,0506,229
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.5
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.95"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,160 mAh8,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)16 h25.4 h
Wired charging45 W100 W
Charged in 30 min42%62%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.36
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEOGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.4 LUFS-20.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHIOS 16HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised3—
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—80 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—B
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare