- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 50 Pro 4G vs nubia Air Pro
Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G vs ZTE nubia Air Pro
What Camon 50 Pro 4G does better (8) and where nubia Air Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display9.6
9.0Camera7.0
8.6Battery6.8
5.8Features7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 50 Pro 4Gnubia Air Pro
| Camon 50 Pro 4G | nubia Air Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 162.6 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 75.4 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 6 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Weight | 171 g | 172 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 50 Pro 4G better than nubia Air Pro?
- Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+23%
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia Air Pro: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · nubia Air Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · nubia Air Pro: No
- Wired charging60 W vs 45 W+33%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Memory card slotYes · nubia Air Pro: No
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia Air Pro: No
Why is nubia Air Pro better than Camon 50 Pro 4G?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- 5GNo · Camon 50 Pro 4G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 441 ppi+3%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 6 mm+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 171 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 6 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 162.6 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Unspecified | Reinforced glass |
| Colours | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Ethereal blue | Aero White, Prime Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 441 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 90.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 569,394 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,034 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 60 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 56 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | D |
